While a portrait photographer might find it irresistible, historically my landscape and travel shooting is some 75% horizontal in orientation. Build quality was very nice, but the first hurdle was the portrait orientation of the viewfinder. A half hour with the Bronica and I knew it wasn’t for me. Mike Johnson has contributed a thoughtful rebuttal review of the Bronica RF645. Photographed with a Mamiya 7 II and 65mm f/4 lens I had a trip with some major hiking coming up, my Spring 2001 Master Class in southern Utah, and I wanted a light-weight system that also offered high-image quality for it, and future hiking trip. I decided that what I would do was a shootout between these two systems and then would purchase the winner. Its only competitor in the interchangeable-lens roll-film rangefinder arena was the Mamiya 7 II. Since 1996 my primary landscape tool has been the superb Rollei 6008. But on long or difficult hikes it can be just too bulky and heavy for the job.Īt Photokina in September 2000, Bronica introduced its RF645 - seemingly an ideal tool for the applications I had in mind. But I find 35mm film (and digital) lacking in the quality that I’m looking for when doing serious landscape work. I use 35mm equipment ( Canon EOS) extensively for wildlife work and specialized applications where long lenses, motor drives and similar advantages are needed. Recently, I’ve been a big fan of the Hasselblad XPan.
I’m a long-time rangefinder fan, having used a succession of M-Series Leicas both professionally and personally over many years. Since then I’ve encountered a number of occasions when a medium-format rangefinder camera would have made sense – particularly on field-trips with extensive hiking involved. Though I had no personal experience with this camera system it seemed like a fair evaluation and so I published it. In late 2000 Jack Zyberk submitted a review of the Mamiya 7 II to this site.
0 kommentar(er)
